Your cart is currently empty!
LPAlliance is an inter-caucus coalition rebuilding and revolutionizing the Libertarian Party under a “liberty first strategy” that puts libertarian leadership, activism, and principles above all else—inside and outside the Party.
We recognize that a clear vision for powerful change is needed in order to move the Party forward. We are allies in liberty: Radicals, Anarchists, Libertarian Socialists, Ron Paul Libertarians, Classical Liberals, Green Libertarians, and non-affiliated members committed to moving from vision to victory.
LPAlliance is not a bloc. We are not an intra-Party issue faction. We have one goal and one goal only: Creating a Libertarian Party and building a world that celebrates the power of the individual in championing the cause of liberty. Those of us who belong to caucuses still belong to our respective caucuses. Our members continue to hold different views as to how the Party should fight for our shared principles. What we are united in is our fight to make sure that all of those views have a voice.
LPAlliance is the organizational hub for two interrelated and concurrent initiatives. The first is to strengthen and revitalize the Party internally in order to realize the libertarian vision for radical political change. The second is to make that change happen.
We’re doing more and demanding better for our Party, our country, and our world.
A Party of Principle—and Power.
Political parties run candidates. The Libertarian Party has a duty to place as many libertarians on as many ballots—national and local—as possible.
Yet the Libertarian Party—and each of its members—are not the stewards of any candidate. We have seen what happens to a party’s principles when the candidate runs the party instead of the converse. Our candidates, together with our Party and ourselves, are stewards of our cause.
A campaign is one of many means to an end for a political party, and particularly a minor party, where a national campaign serves more or less as a PR campaign for that party’s ideology. But we cannot afford to propagate our ideology only once every two to four years. Nor can we afford to concentrate on winning elections only: If winning elections becomes our sole interest, we will cease to run libertarian candidates in fairly short order.
We also cannot wait for public attention to turn toward elections before we begin jockeying for earned media in an environment already saturated with better-funded candidates. It is our job to turn public attention toward our causes—libertarian causes—in between elections in order to build up votes for libertarian candidates during them.
That is why no successful political party, major or minor, has ever only run candidates. Parties educate, agitate, advocate, ally, and empower; and the most powerful parties are always doing all five at once.
We believe in using a range of tactics and strategies to make the Libertarian Party powerful—and always toward the realization of libertarian principles.
In the months leading to Grand Rapids 2026, we are staging and executing a multi-front effort toward making our Party an engine of education, agitation, advocacy, coalition alignment, and individual empowerment—and, through all this, electoral victory—via:
Why: During the growth stages of a movement, open discourse and principled policy disagreement are essential for member recruitment and platform visibility. There is not enough of any one type of Libertarian sufficient to effect lasting political change on any issue. Solidarity is critical for recruitment and strength—but solidarity is necessarily the product of disparate groups working together toward a definitive purpose.
In order to demonstrate solidarity, we must demonstrate that we are indeed comprised of disparate groups with differing ideas—and that means publicly expressing our competing ideas alongside our common purpose.
This runs counter to what people have come to expect from our present political environment, where partisans’ insistence on “unity” above all else sows division and weakness in fact. Most Americans have experience only with institutional parties—like the Republican and Democratic parties—which boast short-term consistency when it comes to policy demands but lend themselves out to the loudest or highest-bidding interest groups when it comes to their principles. Ideological parties, by contrast, which are typically minor parties, enjoy long-term consistency when it comes to principles but competition when it comes to the policies prescribed in their name.
Because our two major parties are strictly institutional, the public has learned to regard politics as tribal rather than ideological. Political participation and representation have become identitarian spectator sports, rather than matters of purposive, individual action. The only way to shift the prevailing political paradigm away from the tyranny of the former is to demonstrate the virtue of the latter.
How:
Why: Individual liberty requires individual action—and it requires that we act not only as Libertarians, but as human beings who believe in the power of the individual self-owner to declare his own destiny.
Action, in this case, means two things. First, it means organizing with other human beings who believe similarly and who are willing to fight to return that power to those from whom it has been deprived. Second, it means leading that fight and spearheading the movement that buoys it—because if we do not, then either no one will or someone else will; and we cannot predict the motives of that other, nor what causes they might attach to the ones that we share.
It is our responsibility to bring our own uniquenesses and skills to the work we do together, and to realize our individuality through the realization of our cause. This is not a time for passivity. Whatever is happening that we know to be wrong, it is incumbent upon us to right.
How:
Why: Ours is an inherently international movement. As individuals who reject the cult of the omnipotent state, we refuse to allow national borders to dictate the boundaries of libertarian struggle. There are Libertarian Parties in 21 countries officially, including six former Soviet republics (which routinely boast the strongest Libertarian showings electorally). Many of these parties’ leaders and members are regularly arrested, persecuted, and intimidated by authoritarian governments.
Solidarity is both a moral and a pragmatic imperative: Especially in a globally interconnected and interdependent world, our ambitions, whether for a decentralized state or for a stateless society, can only realistically be achieved absent the aggression or opportunism of other political powers. We must buoy, in speech and in action, the efforts of other parties and persons globally who share our demand to live freely and enjoy the fruits of one another’s commerce absent exploitation. Only then will the force of the liberty movement be strong enough, and the allure of isolationist statism weak enough, that our movement can attain lasting and far-reaching success.
How: